Exosomes: Different Methods of Counting
Why do we need to count exosomes?
Exosomes as therapeutics are considered to be a drug, biologic. Therefore, like any chemical based drugs it is important to know the dose.
Counting extracellular vesicles (EVs) is crucial for understanding their role in cellular communication, disease diagnostics, and therapeutic applications. Various methods are available, each with its own advantages and limitations.
Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA)
Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) is a widely used technique for characterizing nanoparticles, including exosomes, by analyzing their size distribution and concentration. It works by tracking the Brownian motion of individual particles in a liquid suspension and using the Stokes Einstein equation to determine their size.

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis Mechanism

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis Pros and Cons
How it works: Uses laser light scattering and Brownian motion to track and count individual particles in suspension.
Pros:
- Provides size distribution and concentration.
- High sensitivity for particles in the 30–1000 nm range.
- Real-time visualization of particles.
Cons:
- Limited by sample purity (contaminants can skew results).
- Requires specialized equipment and expertise.
- Lower resolution for polydisperse samples.
- Requires good sample preparation (free from contaminants) to avoid false readings. Requires good sample preparation (free from contaminants) to avoid false readings.
- Double counting of particles
NTA Results

Conclusion:
NTA is a valuable tool for exosome characterization, offering detailed size and concentration data with minimal sample preparation. However, its limitations in handling polydisperse samples, sensitivity to contaminants, and lack of biomarker information should be considered when designing experiments. Combining NTA with other techniques can provide a more comprehensive understanding of exosome biology.
NanoView
ExoView is a platform used for the analysis of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles (EVs). It employs a microarray-based technology to capture and characterize exosomes directly from biofluids.

How Does it Work?

Pros and Cons of NanoView
Pros:
- High Sensitivity: ExoView can detect and quantify exosomes at very low concentrations, which is crucial for studying exosomes in biological samples where they may be present in limited amounts.
- Multiplexing Capability: The platform allows for the simultaneous detection of multiple exosome surface markers. This is beneficial for phenotyping exosomes and understanding their biological roles.
- High Throughput: The platform can analyze multiple samples in parallel, increasing the throughput and efficiency of exosome studies.
Cons:
- Cost: The ExoView platform and its consumables can be expensive, which may be a barrier for some laboratories, especially those with limited budgets.
- Specialized Equipment: The technology requires specialized equipment that may not be readily available in all research settings.
- Limited to Surface Markers: ExoView primarily focuses on the analysis of exosome surface markers.
Conclusion
In summary, ExoView offers a powerful and sensitive tool for exosome analysis, particularly for surface marker profiling and counting. However, researchers must weigh the benefits against the costs and potential limitations when deciding whether to use this technology for their specific applications.
NanoView Data

NanoFCM (Nanoscale Flow Cytometry)
NanoFCM (Nanoscale Flow Cytometry) is an advanced technique for analyzing extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes, by combining the principles of traditional flow cytometry with enhanced sensitivity for nanoparticles. It is particularly useful for characterizing and counting exosomes due to its high resolution and ability to detect small particles.

NanoFCM Pros
-
High Sensitivity for Small Particles
Capable of detecting and analyzing exosomes as small as 40 nm, which is below the detection limit of conventional flow cytometry.
-
High-Throughput Analysis
Can process thousands of particles per second, making it suitable for large-scale studies and clinical applications.
-
Multiparametric Analysis
Allows simultaneous measurement of multiple parameters, such as size, concentration, and surface markers, using fluorescent labeling.
-
Single-Particle Resolution
Provides detailed information on individual exosomes, enabling precise characterization of heterogeneous populations.
-
Minimal Sample Preparation
Requires minimal sample preprocessing compared to techniques like electron microscopy or ultracentrifugation.
NanoFCM Pros
-
Quantitative and Qualitative Data
Delivers both absolute counts and size distribution of exosomes, along with biomarker expression profiles.
-
Compatibility With Fluorescent Labels
Can be used with fluorescently labeled antibodies or dyes to identify specific exosome subpopulations or biomarkers.
-
Wide Dynamic Range
Capable of analyzing a broad range of particle sizes, from 40 nm to 1 μm, covering most exosomes and microvesicles.
-
Rapid Analysis
Provides results in minutes, making it a time-efficient method for exosome characterization.
-
No Need for Purification
Can analyze exosomes directly in complex biological fluids (e.g., plasma, serum, urine) without extensive purification steps.
NanoFCM Cons
-
Calibration and Standardization
Requires calibration with standardized particles, and results may vary depending on the calibration protocol used.
-
Limited Structural Information
Provides size and biomarker data but does not offer detailed morphological or structural insights (unlike electron microscopy).
-
Cost of Equipment
The instrument is expensive, which may limit its accessibility for some labs.
NanoFCM Capability
